Preview

Aterotromboz = Atherothrombosis

Advanced search

Regarding the choice of Р2У12 platelet receptor blocker in the early invasive approach to acute coronary syndrome treatment in patients without indications for long-term anticoagulant use

https://doi.org/10.21518/2307-1109-2020-2-66-74

Abstract

In case of early invasive approach to the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients without indications forlong-term anticoagulants, double antithrombocytic therapy is recommended - a combination of acetylsalicylic acid with one of the blockers of P2Y12 platelet receptor (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor). In this case, patients who do not have an excessively high risk of bleeding, there is evidence in favor of the choice of prasugrel or ticagrelor. Which of them is preferable in cases where in the first hours after hospitalization it is planned to perform coronary stenting is not fully clarified.
The drawbacks of the randomized open PRAGUE-18 study do not allow us to judge the comparative effectiveness and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
ц The ISAR-REACT 5 study was relatively small and has its strengths as well as weaknesses. However, the European expert community considers the results to be sufficient to change the practical approaches to acute coronary syndrome treatment. Thus, according to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome without stable ST segment elevations on ECG, which were updated in September 2020, prasugrel is proposed to be considered as a preferred treatment for ticagrelor in cases where the patient is directed to percutaneous coronary intervention (class IIa recommendation, degree of evidence B).

 

About the Author

I. S. Yavelov
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Igor S. Yavelov - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Department of Clinical Cardiology and Molecular Genetics, National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine.
10, Petroverigskiy Lane, Moscow, 101990.



References

1. Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S., Antunes M.J., Bucciarelli-Ducci C., Bueno H., Caforio A.L.P. et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.

2. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J.P., Mueller C., Valgimigli M., Andreotti F. et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267 -315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.

3. Collet J.P., Thiele H., Barbato E., Barthelemy O., Bauersachs J., Bhatt D.L. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020;ehaa575. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.

4. Thiele H., Akin I., Sandri M., Fuernau G., de Waha S., Meyer-Saraei R. et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2419-2432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710261.

5. Thiele H., Akin I., Sandri M., de Waha-Thiele S., Meyer-Saraei R., Fuernau G. et al. One-year outcomes after PCI strategies in cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1699-1710. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808788.

6. Montalescot G., Bolognese L., Dudek D., Goldstein P., Hamm C., Tanguay J.F. et al. Pretreatment with pra-sugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):999-1010. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308075.

7. Wallentin L., Becker R.C., Budaj A., Cannon C.P., Emanuelsson H., Held C. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopi-dogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045-1057. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327.

8. Wiviott S.D., Braunwald E., McCabe C.H., Montalescot G., Ruzyllo W., Gottlieb S. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001-2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482.

9. Motovska Z., Hlinomaz O., Miklik R., Hromadka M., Varvarovsky I., Dusek J. et al. Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 Study. Circulation. 2016;134(21):1603-1612. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823.

10. Motovska Z., Hlinomaz O., Kala P., Hromadka M., Knot J., Varvarovsky I. et al. 1-Year Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(4):371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.008.

11. SchQpke S., Neumann F.J., Menichelli M., Mayer K., Bernlochner I., Wohrle J. et al. Ticagrelor or pra-sugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973.

12. Ndrepepa G., Kastrati A., Menichelli M., Neumann F.J., Wohrle J., Bernlochner I. et al. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Mellitus. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(19):2238-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.032.

13. Menichelli M., Neumann F.J., Ndrepepa G., Mayer K., Wohrle J., Bernlochner I. et al. Age- and Weight-Adapted Dose of Prasugrel Versus Standard Dose of Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From a Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(6):436-444. doi: 10.7326/M20-1806.

14. Sulzgruber P., Niessner A. Prasugrel vs. ticagrelor after acute coronary syndrome: a critical appraisal of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6(5):273-274. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz077.

15. Jneid H. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes - The Winner Takes It All? N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1582-1584. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1911207.

16. Banning A.P., Crea F., LQscher T.F. The year in cardiology: acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(7):821-832. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz942.

17. Kubica J., Jaguszewski M. ISAR-REACT 5 - What have we learned? Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):427-428. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0090.

18. Bittl J.A., Yong C.M., Sharma G. When to Believe Unexpected Results for Ticagrelor or Prasugrel. Never Rarely Sometimes Always. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(19):2248-2250. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.012.


Review

For citations:


Yavelov I.S. Regarding the choice of Р2У12 platelet receptor blocker in the early invasive approach to acute coronary syndrome treatment in patients without indications for long-term anticoagulant use. Aterotromboz = Atherothrombosis. 2020;(2):66-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2307-1109-2020-2-66-74

Views: 1014


ISSN 2307-1109 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5952 (Online)