IMPACT OF ABCB1 AND CES1 GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ON TROUGH STEADY-STATE DABIGATRAN CONCENTRATIONS IN PATIENTS AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS OF KNIFE JOIN

Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent thromboembolic events in patients following total knee arthroplasty [1]. The genetic characteristics of patients affect the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants [2]. Dabigatran etexilate is a direct inhibitor of thrombin used as a prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in Europe and Russia. [3]. This study evaluated the impact of ABCB1 and CES1 genetic polymorphisms on the peak and residual dabigatran concentration in orthopedic patients. Material and methods: A total of 30 patients aged 43 to 77 years following knee joint replacement were enrolled in the study. All patients received dabigatran etexilate at a dose of 220 mg/day for the prevention of VTEO. ABCB1 and CES1 genetic polymorphism genotyping was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The peak and residual concentrations of dabigatran were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: It was found that the ТТ genotype of the MDR1 gene С3435Т polymorphism is associated with a higher peak concentration of dabigatran than the CC genotype (p <0.1). Statistically significant results for CES1 gene rs2244613 polymorphism were obtained in patients younger than 60 years (p <0.05). The analysis of the haplotypes combination in two polymorphisms showed that the most common haplotype combination CC (rs1045642) ABCB1/CT (rs2244613) CES1 was significantly associated with a higher peak concentration of dabigatran compared to the rest of haplotype combinations (p = 0.002). Conclusions: The examination of a cohort of patients receiving dabigatran for the prevention of VTE during the period of large joints arthroplasty showed that SNPs C3435T ABCB1 and rs2244613 CES1 could play an important role in changing dabigatran concentrations. No data suggestive of the impact of SNP ABCB1 rs4148738 on the peak concentration of dabigatran were received.

1. Shevchenko YuL. Complex prevention of venous thromboembolic events following knee and hip joint endoprosthetics. Meditsinsky Sovet, 2014, 2: 8-12.

2. Burkova TV, Goncharova IA. Genetic factors affecting the efficacy and safety of prolonged anticoagulant therapy. Kardiovaskulyarnaya Terapiya i Profilaktika, 2013, 12 (3): 89-94.

3. The Russian clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTEE). Flebologiya, 2015, 4 (2).

4. Borisov DB, Kirov MYu. Endoprosthetics of hip and knee joints: epidemiological aspects and impact on the quality of life. Ekologiya Cheloveka, 2013, 8: 52-57.

5. Dyakov I. Novel oral anticoagulants: a niche in the domestic pharmaceutical market. Remedium. Zhurnal o Rossiyskom Rynke Lekarstv i Meditsinskoy Tekhniki, 2014, 11: 42-43.

6. Kuzmin II, Akhtyamov IF, Sorokin VA Thromboembolic complications in endoprosthetics of hip joints. The genius of orthopedics, 2004, 4: 63-68.

7. Bozhkova S. Features of the choice of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thrombosis and embolism following major orthopedic surgery: the view of a clinical pharmacologist. Travmatologiya i Ortopediya Rossii, 2011, 1 (59): 1-6.

8. Kotelnikov MV. Anticoagulant therapy for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis: international guidelines and actual clinical practice. Lechebnoe Delo, 2012, 4: 20-37.

9. Patient Information Leaflet for Pradaxa. 2016. 34 p.

10. Kurdyukov ID, et al. «Esterase status» of an organism when exposed to toxic substances and pharmaceuticals. Toksikologicheskiy Vestnik, 2012, 6: 6-12.

11. Lockridge O, Quinn DM. 4.14 –Esterases. Comprehensive Toxicology (Second Edition). 2010: 243–273.

12. Sychev DA, Kryukov AV, Tereshchenko OV. Pharmacogenetic aspects of the use of novel oral anticoagulants. Ratsionalnaya Farmakoterapiya v Kardiologii, 2017, 13 (3): 416-421.

13. Pare G et al. Genetic determinants of dabigatran plasma levels and their relation to bleeding. Circulation, 2013, 127(13): 1404–1412.

14. Liesenfeld KH et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the RE-LY trial. J Thromb Haemost, 2011, 9(11): 2168–2175.

15. Stangier J, Clemens A. Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2009, 15(Suppl 1): 9–16.

16. Gilyarov MYu. Dabigatran: how to choose the optimal dose in real clinical practice? Vestnik Aritmologii, 2012, 69: 77-80

17. Shi J et al. Dabigatran etexilate activation is affected by the CES1 genetic polymorphism G143E (rs71647871) and gender. Biochem. Pharmacol., 2016, 119: 76–84.

18. Zhu HJ et al. Role of carboxylesterase 1 and impact of natural genetic variants on the hydrolysis of trandolapril. Biochem Pharmacol, 2009, 77(7): 1266–1272.

19. Zhu HJ, Markowitz JS. Activation of the antiviral prodrug oseltamivir is impaired by two newly identified carboxylesterase 1 variants. Drug Metab Dispos, 2009, 37(2): 264–267.

20. Dimatteo C et al. Pharmacogenetics of dabigatran etexilate interindividual variability. Thromb Res Elsevier Ltd, 2016, 144: 1–5.

21. Shchulkin AV, Yakusheva EN, Popova NM. The role of glycoprotein-P in rational pharmacotherapy in cardiology. Ratsionalnaya Farmakoterapiya v Kardiologii, 2013, 9 (6): 701-707.

22. Vorobyova NM, Panchenko EP. Dabigatran etexilate is a novel oral anticoagulant for the treatment of venous thromboembolic events. Aterotromboz, 2014, 1: 50-58.