FONDAPARINUX IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST SEGMENT ELEVATION – JUSTIFICATION FOR USING AND REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.21518/2307-1109-2018-1-26-32
Abstract
Prevention of activation of blood coagulation is a cornerstone of treatment strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Medications that are used for this purpose help stop building up of blood clots in the area of damaged atherosclerotic plaque and prevent the development or recurrence of coronary artery occlusion. At the same time, the antithrombotic action should be versatile and prevent both thrombocyte and thrombotic mechanisms of blood clotting. The reduced platelet aggregation is achieved by prescription of aspirin with ticagrelor, clopidogrel or prasugrel as early as possible (and, if necessary, addition of platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockers). Parenteral anticoagulants – unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), fondaparinux are used to prevent the thrombin formation in the early periods of ACS. At the same time, the current clinical guidelines for the treatment of ACS with ST elevation recommend to use UFH in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), enoxaparin in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with a fibrin-specific agent, and fondaparinux in streptokinase thrombolytic therapy [1]. The current guidelines for treatment of ACS without ST elevation (ACSwSTe) argue that fondaparinux should be preferred to other anticoagulants [2]. It came into use for the treatment of ACS later than any other anticoagulants, ranks higher in the ACSwSTe guidelines, and, therefore, deserves a separate discussion.
References
1. Ibanez B, James, S, Agewall S et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European Heart Journal, ehx393. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
2. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal, 2016 January 14, 37 (Issue 3): 267–315.
3. Интернет-ресурс РЛС. / Internet-resource Register of Medicinal Products of Russia. https://www.rlsnet.ru/mnn_index_id_3221.htm
4. Cheng JW. Fondaparinux: a new antithrombotic agent. Clin Ther, 2002 Nov, 24 (11): 1757–1769.
5. Tran AH, Lee G. Fondaparinux for prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery. Ann Pharmacother, 2003 Nov, 37 (11): 1632–1643.
6. Murphy SA et al. Efficacy and safety of the low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndrome spectrum: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J, 2007, 28 (17): 2077–2086.
7. Turpie AG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR. Fondaparinux vs enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies. Arch Intern Med, 2002, 162 (16): 1833–1840.
8. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H et al. Fondaparinux or enoxaparin for the initial treatment of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 140 (11): 867–873.
9. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H et al. Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349 (18): 1695–1702.
10. Mehta SR, Steg PG, Granger CB et al. Randomized, blinded trial comparing fondaparinux with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Arixtra Study in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Randomized Evaluation (ASPIRE) Pilot Trial. Circulation, 2005, 111 (11): 1390–1397.
11. Simoons ML, Bobbink IW, Boland J et al. A dose-finding study of fondaparinux in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Pentasaccharide in Unstable Angina (PENTUA) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 43 (12): 2183–2190.
12. Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354 (14): 1464–1476.
13. Jernberg T, Szummer K. Real-world registry study confirms fondaparinux over low-molecular-weight heparin for NSTEMI. EMJ Cardiol, 2015, 2: 89–93.
14. Erlikh AD, Gratsiansky NA on behalf of the participants of the RECORD register. RECORD Acute Coronary Syndromes Register. Characteristics of patients and treatment before discharge from the hospital. Kardiologiya, 2009, 7–8: 4–12.
15. Erlich AD, Kharchenko MS, Barbarash OL, Kashtalap VV, Zykov MV, Pecherina TB, Shevchenko II, Islamov RR, Kosmacheva ED, Kruberg LK, Pozdnyakova OA, Goroshko NG, Markov VA, Syrkina AG, Belokopytova NV, Gorbunov VV, Gagarkina L. S., Kalinkina TV, Zaitseva OD, Lukyanov SA, Tagirova DR, Provotorov VM, Gratsiansky NA. Degree of commitment to the guidelines for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in the clinical practice of Russian hospitals and outcomes during hospitalization period (data from RECORD-2 register). Kardiologiya, 2013, 1: 14–22.
16. Erlikh AD, Gratsiansky NA on behalf of all participants of RECORD and RECORD-2 registers. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevations in the practice of Russian hospitals: comparative data of RECORD and RECORD-2 registers. Kardiologiya, 2012, 10: 9–14.
17. Erlick AD, Gratsiansky NA on behalf of the participants of RECORD-3 register. RECORD-3 Russian acute coronary syndrome registry. Characteristics of patients and treatment before discharge from the hospital. Kardiologiya, 2016, 4: 16–24.
18. De Matos Soeiro А, Melo de Barros e Silva PG, de Castro Roque EA et al. Fondaparinux versus Enoxaparin – Which is the Best Anticoagulant for Acute Coronary Syndrome? – Brazilian Registry Data. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2016, 107 (3): 239–244.
19. Pepe C, Machado M, Olimpio A, Ramos R. Cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2012, 99 (1): 613–622.
20. Ross Terres JA, Lozano-Ortega G, Kendall R, Sculpher MJ. Cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in Canada (OASIS-5) BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2015, 15 (1): 180–180.
21. Permsuwan U, Chaiyakunapruk N, Nathisuwan S, Sukonthasarn A. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in Thailand. Heart Lung Circ, 2015 Sep, 24 (9): 860-868.
Review
For citations:
Erlikh A.D. FONDAPARINUX IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITHOUT ST SEGMENT ELEVATION – JUSTIFICATION FOR USING AND REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE. Aterotromboz = Atherothrombosis. 2018;(1):26-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2307-1109-2018-1-26-32

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.